Author
Message
BMod Pro





Joined: May 10, 2008
Mods Posted: 50
Forum Posts: 1,574
Posted: March 18, 2009 at 9:14 pm

Report -
you'd cut into some major stuff doing that
when someone has a subincision it is cut through the urethra
the way you've drawn it means you would cut through your shaft tissue and right through the corpora cavernosa
although this would be an interesting and new spin on penis bifurcation,
you would be dead or have to pay some highly skilled surgeons to tackle all the difficulties involved.
what scares me is is that you havent even looked up anatomy to see what your dick is made up of.
the reason you havent seen this before is cos it just aint possible!
Edited by Terri-Sian on March 19, 2009 at 3:12 am
Mod Zentity





Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Mods Posted: 78
Forum Posts: 3,139
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 9:00 am

Report -
If the corpo-fancy-talking-jargon, and the caver-anatomy-B-S are such a problem to cut,
how are cocks being cut in half all the way to the shaft?
I theorize that there would be more danger in hitting a major vein,
by going down the center.
I think that his idea is possible, the question is how.
You are correct about muscle damage if done incorrect.

You looked at Grey's anatomy and saw an impossibility.
I look at this and see hope.
how are cocks being cut in half all the way to the shaft?
I theorize that there would be more danger in hitting a major vein,
by going down the center.
I think that his idea is possible, the question is how.
You are correct about muscle damage if done incorrect.
You looked at Grey's anatomy and saw an impossibility.
I look at this and see hope.
Edited by felonious drunk on March 19, 2009 at 9:01 am
BMod Pro





Joined: May 10, 2008
Mods Posted: 50
Forum Posts: 1,574
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 9:27 am

Report -
i actually looked at that very picture
he asked for professional advice. i spoke to my other half (who knows a damn lot about genital work) in great detail about this is idea.
i posted our advice.if words are too big, you could look them up on wikipeadia
no copy of gray's anatomy were harmed let alone used during the typing of my posts
Edited by Terri-Sian on March 19, 2009 at 9:31 am
Mod Zentity





Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Mods Posted: 78
Forum Posts: 3,139
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 10:42 am

Report -
I'm aware of anatomy, I was being a douche.
I'm trying to be constructive.
You must admit, if a penis can be turned into a vagina,
then there must be a way to turn a perfectly good penis, into a fucked up looking penis.
Look at the way the cavernosa meets the cavernosum.
I think if he cuts between the two cavernosa, and avoids the dorsal veins,
then he would be safe.
So that's the top.
Now he should be able to feel between the spongiosum and cavernosa.
Separating them shouldn't be too difficult (assumption of skill)
I keep saying "cut" but I think that it should be ligatured.
(you're definitely right that his markings would have to be changed)
I'm trying to be constructive.
You must admit, if a penis can be turned into a vagina,
then there must be a way to turn a perfectly good penis, into a fucked up looking penis.
Look at the way the cavernosa meets the cavernosum.
I think if he cuts between the two cavernosa, and avoids the dorsal veins,
then he would be safe.
So that's the top.
Now he should be able to feel between the spongiosum and cavernosa.
Separating them shouldn't be too difficult (assumption of skill)
I keep saying "cut" but I think that it should be ligatured.
(you're definitely right that his markings would have to be changed)
Edited by felonious drunk on March 19, 2009 at 10:43 am
Mod-let





Joined: Dec 1, 2008
Mods Posted: 1
Forum Posts: 505
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 11:23 am

Report -
Dude after reading all the posts, I think if you really want this done it should be professionally done unless you know all about all the different parts that felonious_drunk and Terri-Sian were talking about and exactly where they are in your penis. I would definitely not recommend doing this to yourself unless you knew all about the anatomy. I mean, you could think you understand it and then get to the actual cutting and be like "wtf which is which?!" and then that would suck.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say you're stupid or anything, I'm just saying don't try it till you're absolutely sure and definitely consult the professionals.
Besides that, I think this is a kickass idea and would love to see pictures if you actually do it.
Good luck.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say you're stupid or anything, I'm just saying don't try it till you're absolutely sure and definitely consult the professionals.
Besides that, I think this is a kickass idea and would love to see pictures if you actually do it.
Good luck.
Mod God





Joined: Jul 5, 2008
Mods Posted: 31
Forum Posts: 710
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 12:06 pm

Report -
I agree that this is definately not something to look into lightly but in theory if you were only cutting into the glans wouldn't you be ok? For the sake of argument lets say that he goes with the idea that I initially posted and flips his design upside down so that it forms a Y shape. The bottom would be simple as it would only be a meatotomy/small subincision. Then if he only split the glans on the top wouldn't he be able to avoid the corpus cavernosa? I know that for genital piercings through the head, the corpus cavernosa are generally avoided. BME's wiki says that you can pierce the corpus cavernosa and not bleed to death (http://wiki.bmezine.com/index.php/Corpus_cavernosum) but for a procedure like the splitting in question I'd imagine you'd want to avoid cutting into the corpus cavernosa to avoid problems with excessive bleeding and possible erection problems. Like I said before, I'm no expert and I won't be offended if someone posts and proves my theory completely wrong. To the original poster - if you do choose to persue this mod more seriously I'd be very careful in choosing your artist and make sure that you're aware of the possibility of serious complications. A head splitting in and of itself is a serious mod, but taking on a new variant of this procedure is even more risky. As I've said on the forums before, I'm all for people doing what they choose with their bodies, but I also feel that before taking on a risky/extreme procedure they should be fully aware of the risks involved and be prepared to deal with the result should they encounter the worst possible outcome of the procedure. Don't forget that you always have the option of going with a regular headsplit. These have been done more often and I'm sure you could speak to someone on here who could tell you more about their personal experiences.
BMod Pro





Joined: May 10, 2008
Mods Posted: 50
Forum Posts: 1,574
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 5:24 pm

Report -
all im saying, like in my original post, is that i really dont reccommend doing this unless you go see a plastic surgeon who has the correct equipment, technology and know how.
Mod Zentity





Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Mods Posted: 78
Forum Posts: 3,139
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 5:57 pm

Report -
I think that there is more potential success with the inverted Y
Feel your cock, stroke it a little to get it stiff.
Put your thumb on the top of the shaft, and press in.
Look at that giant vein on the top of the shaft, and press along it.
It should feel like two parallel tubes connected very close to each other.
Now feel the bottom,
All along the bottom you should feel a softer tissue.
It is spongy and surrounds the urethra.
If you were to cut the head of your dick off,
The spaces between these tissues would be in the shape of a Mercedes hood ornament.
That is exactly what was drawn.
Another problem that I see,
is that if the intent is to separate these parts;
when is the cut changed from the urethra, to up higher between the nosa and the sponge?
Past the head?
Mod God





Joined: Jul 5, 2008
Mods Posted: 31
Forum Posts: 710
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 9:44 pm

Report -
It's really a tough thing to figure out. I agree with what felonious drunk pointed out in his last post but somehow I still feel that that might be more pertinent if you were splitting your entire penis in thirds rather than just the head. I don't think it would be possible to split an entire penis into thirds but doing just the head might be a possibility. Either way you're talking about some serious work to your happy parts. I'm interested to see how the original poster's appointment with John Durante went. Hopefully he'll post some more info once he goes so that we can get another perspective on this.
Mod Zentity





Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Mods Posted: 78
Forum Posts: 3,139
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 10:07 pm

Report -
I'm trying to imagine what it would look like.
I can see that the top two would be pretty normal.
They would get erect like a normal bisection.
But what about the bottom third?
It wouldn't get erect.
Would it just kind of dangle like a silly looking little tongue?
I can picture it looking like a cartoon character;
with the two cavernosas looking like extruding eyeballs,
a smiley urethra mouth below,
and the spongiosum as a silly dangling tongue.
I can see that the top two would be pretty normal.
They would get erect like a normal bisection.
But what about the bottom third?
It wouldn't get erect.
Would it just kind of dangle like a silly looking little tongue?
I can picture it looking like a cartoon character;
with the two cavernosas looking like extruding eyeballs,
a smiley urethra mouth below,
and the spongiosum as a silly dangling tongue.





